The haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–Impregnated polyurethane foam in osseous defects

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets with those of epinephrine-impregnated polyurethane (PU) foam cubes in osseous defects created in guinea pigs. Initially, these substances were randomly applied to the osseous defects in guinea pigs for 2 min and blood loss was measured. The animals were then sacrificed 7 weeks later and the degree of foreign body reaction was scored. The data were analysed by the independent-samples Kruskal-Wallis test. Epinephrine-impregnated PU foam cubes showed significantly better haemostatic effect compared to epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets. The PU foam containing epinephrine specimens elicited significantly less foreign body reaction compared to epinephrine cotton pellets (P < 0.05). Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that epinephrine-impregnated PU foam cubes are a good alternative to epinephrine-impregnated cotton pellets as a local haemostatic agent in endodontic surgery.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Torabinejad, M., Kang, H. J. S., Maskiewicz, R., & Grandhi, A. (2018). The haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–Impregnated polyurethane foam in osseous defects. Australian Endodontic Journal, 44(3), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

75%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free