Numeric planning via abstraction and policy guided search

12Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The real-world application of planning techniques often requires models with numeric fluents. However, these fluents are not directly supported by most planners and heuristics. We describe a family of planning algorithms that takes a numeric planning problem and produces an abstracted representation that can be solved using any classical planner. The resulting abstract plan is generalized into a policy and then used to guide the search in the original numeric domain. We prove that our approach is sound, and evaluate it on a set of standard benchmarks. Experiments demonstrate competitive performance when compared to other well-known algorithms for numeric planning, and a significant performance improvement in certain domains.

References Powered by Scopus

Z3: An efficient SMT Solver

5726Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Abstract interpretation: "A" unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints

4590Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The FF planning system: Fast plan generation through heuristic search

1440Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Subgoaling techniques for satisficing and optimal numeric planning

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalized planning via abstraction: Arbitrary numbers of objects

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect-abstraction based relaxation for linear numeric planning

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Illanes, L., & McIlraith, S. A. (2017). Numeric planning via abstraction and policy guided search. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 0, pp. 4338–4345). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/606

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Researcher 3

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 9

75%

Materials Science 1

8%

Engineering 1

8%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free