Competition, regulation and nationalization: The prussian railway system in the nineteenth century

23Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

From the 1830s until the 1870s the Prussian railway system became increasingly dense. As density increased, competition among lines became more intense and the making of a reasonable rate of return became more difficult. To overcome these problems the railways merged to form monopolies or entered into collusions. In the late 1870s in order to solve these problems of monopoly and collusion the Prussian government nationalized the railways. The authors contend that this nationalization was more than was necessary for finding a solution to the problems: a policy of competition on the track forcing track owners to accept the trains of any who applied to run over those tracks would have been much better. © 1993 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

References Powered by Scopus

Competition, co-operation and nationalisation in the nineteenth century telegraph system

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What Can We Learn From Comparative Institutional Analysis? The Case of Telecommunications

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Competition and Regulation: The Railroad Model

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Private and public enterprise in Europe: Energy, telecommunications and transport, 1830-1990

214Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Public enterprise in the modern western world: An historical analysis

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Competition in the Rhine delta: Waterways, railways and ports, 1870-1913

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fremdling, R., & Knieps, G. (1993). Competition, regulation and nationalization: The prussian railway system in the nineteenth century. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 41(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.1993.10415864

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

40%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Engineering 1

20%

Psychology 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free