Tree Representations in Transition System for RST Parsing

2Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The transition-based systems in the past studies propose a series of actions to build a right-heavy binarized tree for RST parsing. However, the nodes of the binary-nuclear relations (e.g., Contrast) have the same nuclear type with those of the multi-nuclear relations (e.g., Joint) in the binary tree structure. In addition, the reduce action only construct binary trees instead of multi-branch trees, which is the original RST tree structure. In our paper, we design a new nuclear type for the multi-nuclear relations, and a new action to construct a multi-branch tree. We enrich the feature set by extracting additional refined dependency feature of texts from the Bi-Affine model (Dozat and Manning, 2016). We also compare the performance of two approaches for RST parsing in the transition-based system: a joint action of reduce-shift and nuclear type (i.e., Reduce-SN) vs a separate one that applies Reduce action first and then assigns nuclear type. We find that the new devised nuclear type and action are more capable of capturing the multi-nuclear relation and the joint action is more suitable than the separate one. Our multi-branch tree structure obtains the state-of-the-art performance for all the 18 coarse relations.

References Powered by Scopus

Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization

2535Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discourse complements lexical semantics for non-factoid answer reranking

100Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A two-Stage parsing method for text-Level discourse analysis

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Neural-based RST Parsing And Analysis In Persuasive Discourse

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Survey on English and Chinese Discourse Structure Analysis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, J., & Xiao, L. (2020). Tree Representations in Transition System for RST Parsing. In COLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 6746–6751). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.593

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

68%

Researcher 4

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 17

74%

Linguistics 4

17%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free