Conclusions: Learning from Listening? Why the EU Failed to Learn from the Arab Uprisings and Why that Matters

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This book has above all shown why the EU is not a ‘normative actor’ in the Middle East and how and why EU democracy promotion fails. These efforts fail because the Union promotes the wrong kind of democracy and the wrong kind of strategies for economic growth—wrong both in the sense that these approaches do not work and in the sense that they are not what people want. This double failure highlights a paradox of EU democracy promotion: while nominally an emancipatory endeavour, de facto it undermines those very emancipatory transitions to democracy and to inclusive development which it claims to pursue. In detailing these failures, the book compares conceptions of gender, democracy and human rights. The ‘gap’ between EU images and populations’ self-conceptions explains negative perceptions of the EU—undermining its role as a ‘normative power’—and how the EU’s own narratives ‘other’ Southern Mediterranean Countries’ populations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Teti, A., Abbott, P., Talbot, V., & Maggiolini, P. (2020). Conclusions: Learning from Listening? Why the EU Failed to Learn from the Arab Uprisings and Why that Matters. In European Union in International Affairs (pp. 321–332). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33883-1_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free