Do dual purchasers behave differently? An analysis of purchasing data for households that buy both alcohol and tobacco in the United Kingdom

7Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Aims: Dual purchasers of alcohol and tobacco are at increased health risk from the interacting health impacts of alcohol and tobacco use. They are also at financial risk from exposure to the dual financial cost of policies that increase alcohol and tobacco prices. Understanding whose alcohol and tobacco use exposes them to these health and financial risks is important for understanding the inequality impacts of control policies. This study explores the extent to which household spending on alcohol and tobacco combined varies between socio-economic groups and compares this with results for households which purchase only one of the commodities. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of household-level alcohol and tobacco purchasing data. Setting: United Kingdom, 2012–17. Participants/Cases: A total of 26 021 households. Measurements: We analysed transaction-level data from individual 14-day spending diaries in the Living Cost and Food Survey (LCFS). We used this to calculate expenditure, volumes of alcohol and tobacco purchased, and the price paid per unit of alcohol (1 unit = 8 g) and per stick of tobacco. This was compared with equivalized total expenditure and quintiles of equivalized household income. Prices were calibrated and pack sizes were imputed using empirical sales data from Nielsen/CGA to correct for reporting bias. Findings: Dual purchasing households spent [95% confidence interval] more on alcohol and more on tobacco than their single-purchasing counterparts. In general, lower-income households spent less on both alcohol and tobacco than higher-income households. Furthermore, dual purchasing households in the lowest income group were most exposed to potential increases in price than were other income groups, with (CI = 12.41–13.15%) of their total household budget spent on alcohol and tobacco. Conclusions: Dual purchasers of alcohol and tobacco in the United Kingdom appear to be concentrated evenly among income groups. However, dual purchasers may experience particularly large effects from pricing policies, as they spend a substantially higher proportion of their overall household expenditure on alcohol and tobacco than do households that purchase only one of the commodities.

References Powered by Scopus

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

2402Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: A meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies

719Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: A cross-sectional population study

390Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Options for modifying UK alcohol and tobacco tax: A rapid scoping review of the evidence over the period 1997–2018

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Potential smoke-free dividend across local areas in England: a cross-sectional analysis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimation of integrated price elasticities for alcohol and tobacco in the United Kingdom using the living costs and food survey 2006–2017

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilson, L. B., Angus, C., Pryce, R., Holmes, J., Brennan, A., & Gillespie, D. (2021). Do dual purchasers behave differently? An analysis of purchasing data for households that buy both alcohol and tobacco in the United Kingdom. Addiction, 116(9), 2538–2547. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15430

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Researcher 2

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

30%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

30%

Psychology 2

20%

Engineering 2

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free