Motivations and Challenges for Engineer-to-Order Companies Moving toward Mass Customization

6Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

ETO companies are mainly characterized by their ability to provide personalized products to customers. However, the current market trends and economic situation direct them to efficient manufacturing of customized goods. In this regard, moving toward Mass Customization and making a hybrid strategy of ETO-MC can be considered as a proper solution for ETOs. This study aims at investigating this topic using both theoretical and empirical data, and through analyzing the potential motivations for ETOs to move towards MC and the possible challenges they might face during such a transition. © IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014.

References Powered by Scopus

Product configuration frameworks - A survey

441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Marketing mass-customized products: Striking a balance between utility and complexity

312Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customer integration

267Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A system level product configurator for engineer-to-order supply chains

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Operationalizing lean principles for lead time reduction in engineer-to-order (ETO) operations: A case study

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementing configurators to enable mass customization in the Engineer-to-Order industry: a multiple case study research

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duchi, A., Pourabdollahian, G., Sili, D., Cioffi, M., Taisch, M., & Schönsleben, P. (2014). Motivations and Challenges for Engineer-to-Order Companies Moving toward Mass Customization. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 440, pp. 320–327). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44733-8_40

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

74%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Researcher 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 16

52%

Business, Management and Accounting 10

32%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

10%

Social Sciences 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free