How to develop a more accurate risk prediction model when there are few events

492Citations
Citations of this article
667Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When the number of events is low relative to the number of predictors, standard regression could produce overfitted risk models that make inaccurate predictions. Use of penalised regression may improve the accuracy of risk prediction

References Powered by Scopus

Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso

36075Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net

13257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: The Framingham heart study

5731Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model

1311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology

786Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PROBAST: A tool to assess risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies: Explanation and elaboration

718Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pavlou, M., Ambler, G., Seaman, S. R., Guttmann, O., Elliott, P., King, M., & Omar, R. Z. (2015). How to develop a more accurate risk prediction model when there are few events. BMJ (Online), 351. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3868

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 267

57%

Researcher 128

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 44

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 30

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 257

79%

Mathematics 25

8%

Engineering 22

7%

Computer Science 21

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free