Dashboards for improving patient care: Review of the literature

261Citations
Citations of this article
541Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of evidence for the use of clinical and quality dashboards in health care environments. Methods: A literature search was performed for the dates 1996-2012 on CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsychInfo, Science Direct and ACM Digital Library. A citation search and a hand search of relevant papers were also conducted. Results: One hundred and twenty two full text papers were retrieved of which 11 were included in the review. There was considerable heterogeneity in implementation setting, dashboard users and indicators used. There was evidence that in contexts where dashboards were easily accessible to clinicians (such as in the form of a screen saver) their use was associated with improved care processes and patient outcomes. Conclusion: There is some evidence that implementing clinical and/or quality dashboards that provide immediate access to information for clinicians can improve adherence to quality guidelines and may help improve patient outcomes. However, further high quality detailed research studies need to be conducted to obtain evidence of their efficacy and establish guidelines for their design.

References Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dowding, D., Randell, R., Gardner, P., Fitzpatrick, G., Dykes, P., Favela, J., … Currie, L. (2015, February 1). Dashboards for improving patient care: Review of the literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.10.001

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250255075100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 196

64%

Researcher 57

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 35

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 17

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 98

38%

Computer Science 84

33%

Nursing and Health Professions 52

20%

Engineering 24

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 12

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0