Mapping cellular interactions from spatially resolved transcriptomics data

3Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Cell–cell communication (CCC) is essential to how life forms and functions. However, accurate, high-throughput mapping of how expression of all genes in one cell affects expression of all genes in another cell is made possible only recently through the introduction of spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) technologies, especially those that achieve single-cell resolution. Nevertheless, substantial challenges remain to analyze such highly complex data properly. Here, we introduce a multiple-instance learning framework, Spacia, to detect CCCs from data generated by SRTs, by uniquely exploiting their spatial modality. We highlight Spacia’s power to overcome fundamental limitations of popular analytical tools for inference of CCCs, including losing single-cell resolution, limited to ligand–receptor relationships and prior interaction databases, high false positive rates and, most importantly, the lack of consideration of the multiple-sender-to-one-receiver paradigm. We evaluated the fitness of Spacia for three commercialized single-cell resolution SRT technologies: MERSCOPE/Vizgen, CosMx/NanoString and Xenium/10x. Overall, Spacia represents a notable step in advancing quantitative theories of cellular communications.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, J., Wang, Y., Chang, W. Y., Malewska, A., Napolitano, F., Gahan, J. C., … Wang, T. (2024). Mapping cellular interactions from spatially resolved transcriptomics data. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02408-1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 16

46%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

34%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 17

57%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

17%

Neuroscience 4

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free