From a ludic loom of ideas to the spiral of intercultural co-creation

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

How to implement ludic co-creation from and for interculturality? The validation of a methodological model to design co-creation experiences and/or participatory design (PD) is presented in this paper, as part of a broader study that proposes interculturality as an object of study and practice of design. The process involved eight diverse sociocultural instances that led to the transfiguration of the model. The results showed that participants perceived the prefiguration process as a highly demanding challenge. This allowed us to formulate the following question as a design problem: How to generate pluricultural socio-technical microsystems aimed at prefiguring ludic co-creation experiences without this requiring a high level of design skills? This result being our greatest challenge and contribution to the PDC community, whom we invite to collaboratively assume this challenge derived from the empirical validation of the model shown here.

References Powered by Scopus

The nature of emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots

1589Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning

614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity

420Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Communicating in Intercultural Spaces

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PD as in Prefigurative Design: A ludic framework beyond participation

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Said Valbuena B, W., Montoya Carvajal, A., & Fernanda Pinzon, L. (2020). From a ludic loom of ideas to the spiral of intercultural co-creation. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (Vol. 1, pp. 85–95). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385022

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 3

38%

Design 2

25%

Arts and Humanities 2

25%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free