Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: The roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection

230Citations
Citations of this article
218Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is widespread in lizards, with the most consistently dimorphic traits being head size (males have larger heads) and trunk length (the distance between the front and hind legs is greater in females). These dimorphisms have generally been interpreted as follows: (1) large heads in males evolve through male-male rivalry (sexual selection); and (2) larger interlimb lengths in females provide space for more eggs (fecundity selection). In an Australian lizard (the snow skink, Niveoscincus microlepidotus), we found no evidence for ongoing selection on head size. Trunk length, however, was under positive fecundity selection in females and under negative sexual selection in males. Thus, fecundity selection and sexual selection work in concert to drive the evolution of sexual dimorphism in trunk length in snow skinks.

References Powered by Scopus

On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory.

876Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications.

537Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mammals in which females are larger than males.

432Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism

534Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fecundity selection theory: concepts and evidence

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Climate-driven population divergence in sex-determining systems

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olsson, M., Shine, R., Wapstra, E., Ujvari, B., & Madsen, T. (2002). Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: The roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection. Evolution, 56(7), 1538–1542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01464.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 95

64%

Researcher 29

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 21

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 143

84%

Environmental Science 19

11%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

4%

Sports and Recreations 2

1%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 21

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free