Can the retina alone detect the sign of defocus?

22Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the following point-counterpoint article, internationally-acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the order, Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer-reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point-Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors. © 2013 The College of Optometrists.

References Powered by Scopus

Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia

869Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The complex interactions of retinal, optical and environmental factors in myopia aetiology

617Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks

535Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The wavelength composition and temporal modulation of ambient lighting strongly affect refractive development in young tree shrews

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gene expression in response to optical defocus of opposite signs reveals bidirectional mechanism of visually guided eye growth

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emmetropic, but not myopic human eyes distinguish positive defocus from calculated blur

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schaeffel, F., & Wildsoet, C. (2013). Can the retina alone detect the sign of defocus? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 33(3), 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12058

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

58%

Researcher 8

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

50%

Physics and Astronomy 7

22%

Neuroscience 6

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free