Metabolic characteristics of the various incision margins for breast cancer conservation surgery

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) has recently become the most prevalent malignancy in women. There are many alternative treatments for BC, and for aesthetic and postoperative quality of life concerns, breast-conserving surgery and corresponding adjuvant therapy have become the predominant treatment for early invasive BC. Currently, the main method used to assess the margins for breast-conserving surgery is intraoperative pathological diagnosis. However, the designation of surgical margins is controversial, and metabolomics may be a novel approach to evaluate surgical margins. Methods: We collected specimens from 10 breast cancer patients and samples from its surrounding tissues and divided them into cancerous tissue and 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm and 10 mm cutting edge tissues, with a total of 60 samples. The samples were analyzed by mass spectrometry on an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/Orbitrap high resolution platform. The data were then statistically analyzed to detect metabolic changes in the different cutting edges and to identify possible surgical cutting edges with statistically significant findings. Abnormal metabolic pathways were identified by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), which elucidated potential markers. Results: Statistical analysis indicated that there were substantial differences between the 1 mm margin tissue and the cancer tissue, while there were no statistically significant differences between the 1 mm tissue and tissues from the other margins. The levels of 6 metabolites in the 1 mm tissue were significantly different from those in the cancer tissue and were not significantly different from those in the 2 mm tissue. The six metabolites were pyruvate, N-acetyl-L-aspartate, glutamic acid, γ-aminobutyric acid, fumaric acid, and citric acid. Metabolic pathways such as amino acid metabolism and amino t-RNA synthesis in the margin tissue were significantly distinct from those in cancer tissues based on KEGG analysis. Conclusion: There was a significant difference between the 1 mm margin tissue and the cancerous tissue. Based on metabolomic analysis, the 1 mm negative margin is sufficient for surgery, and the six metabolites that we identified as abnormal, including pyruvic acid, N-acetyl-L-aspartic acid, glutamic acid, gamma-aminobutyric acid, fumaric acid and citric acid, may serve as biomarkers for a negative margin and help surgeons select an appropriate surgical margin.