Exploring the synergies between focused ethnography and integrated knowledge translation

10Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Issues with the uptake of research findings in applied health services research remain problematic. Part of this disconnect is attributed to the exclusion of knowledge users at the outset of a study, which often results in the generation of knowledge that is not usable at the point of care. Integrated knowledge translation blended with qualitative methodologies has the potential to address this issue by working alongside knowledge users throughout the research process. Nevertheless, there is currently a paucity of literature about how integrated knowledge translation can be integrated into qualitative methodology; herein, we begin to address this gap in methodology discourse. The purpose of this paper is to describe our experience of conducting a focused ethnography with a collaborative integrated knowledge translation approach, including the synergies and potential sources of discord between integrated knowledge translation and focused ethnography. Methods: We describe the specific characteristics and synergies that exist when using an integrated knowledge translation approach with focused ethnography, using a research exemplar about the experiences of frail, older adults undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Results: Embedding integrated knowledge translation within focused ethnography resulted in (1) an increased focus on the culture and values of the context under study, (2) a higher level of engagement among researchers, study participants and knowledge users, and (3) a commitment to partnership between researchers and knowledge users as part of a larger programme of research, resulting in a (4) greater emphasis on the importance of reciprocity and trustworthiness in the research process. Conclusions: Engaging in integrated knowledge translation from the outset of a study ensures that research findings are relevant for application at the point of care. The integration of integrated knowledge translation within focused ethnography allows for real-time uptake of meaningful and emerging findings, the strengthening of collaborative research teams, and opportunities for sustained programmes of research and relationships in the field of health services research. Further exploration of the integration of knowledge translation approaches with qualitative methodologies is recommended.

References Powered by Scopus

Patient and family engagement: A framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies

1223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Shattuck lecture: Clinical research to clinical practice - Lost in translation?

785Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: A scoping review

415Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: The Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a co-design approach to developing an integrated model of care for people with multi-morbid COPD in rural Nepal: A qualitative study

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Introduction

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baumbusch, J., Wu, S., Lauck, S. B., Banner, D., O’Shea, T., & Achtem, L. (2018). Exploring the synergies between focused ethnography and integrated knowledge translation. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0376-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

79%

Researcher 5

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 12

38%

Medicine and Dentistry 9

28%

Social Sciences 7

22%

Psychology 4

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free