Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Critically Ill Patients with Gram-Negative Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Analysis

13Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are a major cause of morbidity and death. Because of changes in how LRTIs are defined coupled with the increasing prevalence of drug resistance, there is a gap in knowledge regarding the current burden of antimicrobial use for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-defined LRTIs. We describe the infection characteristics, antibiotic consumption, and clinical and economic outcomes of patients with Gram-negative (GN) LRTIs treated in intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study of adult patients treated in ICUs at two large academic medical centers in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan, from October 2013 to October 2015. To meet the inclusion criteria, patients must have had CDC-defined LRTI caused by a GN pathogen during ICU stay. Microbiological assessment of available Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates included minimum inhibitory concentrations for key antimicrobial agents. Results: Four hundred and seventy-two patients, primarily from the community (346, 73.3%), were treated in medical ICUs (272, 57.6%). Clinically defined pneumonia was common (264, 55.9%). Six hundred and nineteen GN organisms were identified from index respiratory cultures: P. aeruginosa was common (224, 36.2%), with 21.6% of these isolates being multidrug resistant. Cefepime (213, 45.1%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (174, 36.8%) were the most frequent empiric GN therapies. Empiric GN therapy was inappropriate in 44.6% of cases. Lack of in vitro susceptibility (80.1%) was the most common reason for inappropriateness. Patients with inappropriate empiric GN therapy had longer overall stay, which translated to a median total cost of care of $79,800 (interquartile range $48,775 to $129,600) versus $68,000 (interquartile range $38,400 to $116,175), p = 0.013. Clinical failure (31.5% vs 30.0%, p = 0.912) and in-hospital all-cause mortality (26.4% vs 25.9%, p = 0.814) were not different. Conclusion: Drug-resistant pathogens were frequently found and empiric GN therapy was inappropriate in nearly 50% of cases. Inappropriate therapy led to increased lengths of stay and was associated with higher costs of care.

References Powered by Scopus

Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance

9934Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia

0
5565Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bad bugs, no drugs: No ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America

4156Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

New Antibiotics for Pneumonia

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support on piperacillin exposure in septic patients: A case-control study

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spotlight on New Antibiotics for the Treatment of Pneumonia

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Claeys, K. C., Zasowski, E. J., Trinh, T. D., Lagnf, A. M., Davis, S. L., & Rybak, M. J. (2018). Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Critically Ill Patients with Gram-Negative Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Analysis. Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 7(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-017-0179-5

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

63%

Researcher 10

31%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 21

68%

Immunology and Microbiology 4

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

10%

Environmental Science 3

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0