Differentiable contributions of human amygdalar subregions in the computations underlying reward and avoidance learning

45Citations
Citations of this article
133Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To understand how the human amygdala contributes to associative learning, it is necessary to differentiate the contributions of its subregions. However, major limitations in the techniques used for the acquisition and analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data have hitherto precluded segregation of function with the amygdala in humans. Here, we used high-resolution fMRI in combination with a region-of-interest-based normalization method to differentiate functionally the contributions of distinct subregions within the human amygdala during two different types of instrumental conditioning: reward and avoidance learning. Through the application of a computational-model-based analysis, we found evidence for a dissociation between the contributions of the basolateral and centromedial complexes in the representation of specific computational signals during learning, with the basolateral complex contributing more to reward learning, and the centromedial complex more to avoidance learning. These results provide unique insights into the computations being implemented within fine-grained amygdala circuits in the human brain. © 2011 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2011 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prévost, C., Mccabe, J. A., Jessup, R. K., Bossaerts, P., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2011). Differentiable contributions of human amygdalar subregions in the computations underlying reward and avoidance learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 34(1), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07686.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 56

56%

Researcher 28

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 53

60%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14

16%

Neuroscience 11

13%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free