LBA16 Primary analysis of efficacy and safety in the CUPISCO trial: A randomised, global study of targeted therapy or cancer immunotherapy guided by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) vs platinum-based chemotherapy (CTX) in newly diagnosed, unfavourable cancer of unknown primary (CUP)

  • Mileshkin L
  • Bochtler T
  • Pauli C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

LBA16 Primary analysis of efficacy and safety in the CUPISCO trial: A randomised, global study of targeted therapy or cancer immunotherapy guided by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) vs platinum-based chemotherapy (CTX) in newly diagnosed, unfavourable cancer of unknown primary (CUP) Background: With platinum-based CTX, prognosis of patients (pts) with unfavourable CUP is poor; however, CGP may inform treatment strategies based on cancer geno-mics. The CUPISCO trial (NCT03498521) compared the efficacy and safety of molecularly guided therapy (MGT) vs standard platinum-based CTX in pts with newly diagnosed, unfavourable, non-squamous CUP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mileshkin, L., Bochtler, T., Pauli, C., Durán-Pacheco, G., Arslan, C., Bigot, F., … Krämer, A. (2023). LBA16 Primary analysis of efficacy and safety in the CUPISCO trial: A randomised, global study of targeted therapy or cancer immunotherapy guided by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) vs platinum-based chemotherapy (CTX) in newly diagnosed, unfavourable cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Annals of Oncology, 34, S1254–S1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free