A phase II study of fixed-dose capecitabine and assessment of predictors of toxicity in patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer

47Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and activity of fixed-dose capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and to correlate pretreatment plasma concentrations of homocysteine and serum and red cell folate with toxicity. Patients received capecitabine 2000 mg (4 x 500 mg tablets) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. They were reviewed weekly during the first cycle and then three weekly for safety assessment. Eligibility criteria were advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer, ≤2 prior chemotherapy regimens, ECOG performance status 0-2 and life expectancy > 12 weeks. A total of 60 patients were enrolled and 55 were evaluable for efficacy. The median age was 72 years and 63% of patients had a performance status of 1 or 2. Confirmed tumour responses were reported in 15 patients (28%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 15.7-40.3%). The median time to disease progression was 4.9 months and median overall survival was 11.2 months. The median ratio of fixed dose to body surface area (BSA)-calculated dose was 88% (range 65-108%). Significant myelosuppression was not observed. Grade 2/3 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (34%), fatigue (27%), stomatitis (15%) and hand-foot syndrome (22%). Dose reduction due to adverse events was required in 16 patients (29%) and multiple reductions in five patients (9%). There was no grade 3/4 haematological toxicity, any grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths. Patients with higher pretreatment levels of serum folate experienced significantly greater toxicity (P = 0.02, CI: 1.0-1.2) during cycle I and over the entire treatment period (P = 0.04, CI: 1.0-1.3). Pretreatment homocysteine concentrations did not predict for toxicity. In conclusion, fixed-dose capecitabine appears to have similar efficacy and safety compared to the currently recommended dose schedule based on body surface area and simplifies drug administration. A high pretreatment folate may be predictive of increased toxicity from capecitabine. © 2006 Cancer Research.

References Powered by Scopus

New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors

14952Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

3676Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone. as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial

3140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Potential regional differences for the tolerability profiles of fluoropyrimidines

233Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

International society of geriatric oncology chemotherapy taskforce: Evaluation of chemotherapy in older patients - An analysis of the medical literature

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Flat-fixed dosing versus body surface area-based dosing of anticancer drugs in adults: Does it make a difference?

130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharma, R., Rivory, L., Beale, P., Ong, S., Horvath, L., & Clarke, S. J. (2006, April 10). A phase II study of fixed-dose capecitabine and assessment of predictors of toxicity in patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603049

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

32%

Researcher 5

26%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

74%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

11%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

7%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free