Higher Education in Indonesia: The Political Economy of Institution-Level Governance

27Citations
Citations of this article
272Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The poor quality of higher education institutions (HEIs) in Indonesia is due in part to failures of governance at the institution level. Drawing on an analysis of conflict and contestation in three Indonesian HEIs, this article argues that these failures reflect the dominance of predatory officials and business groups in institutional governance and the relative marginalisation of elements who support improved research, teaching and community service in line with either neo-liberal or idealist conceptions of quality. It also argues that some degree of change in governance has been possible when reformist elements have gained control of a HEI and driven change from the top down or such elements have challenged predatory HEI management by leveraging support from external actors with influence. Instances of such change hold out hope for improved governance at Indonesian HEIs in the future. But they also indicate that even if the dominance of predatory elements within HEIs can be overcome, further struggle will be required to define the precise nature of governance reform given competing reformist agendas with markedly different implications for how academic quality and integrity are understood, measured and implemented.

References Powered by Scopus

The "new public management" in the 1980s: Variations on a theme

2630Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets

527Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Introducing regulatory intermediaries

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosser, A. (2023). Higher Education in Indonesia: The Political Economy of Institution-Level Governance. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 53(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2021.2010120

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2504080120160

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 42

58%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

31%

Researcher 5

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 35

56%

Business, Management and Accounting 12

19%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8

13%

Psychology 7

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0