Depression in general intensive care unit survivors: A systematic review

362Citations
Citations of this article
267Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To critically review data on the prevalence of depressive symptoms in general intensive care unit (ICU) survivors, risk factors for these symptoms, and their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Methods: We conducted a systematic review using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and a hand-search of 13 journals. Results: Fourteen studies were eligible. The median point prevalence of "clinically significant" depressive symptoms was 28% (total n = 1,213). Neither sex nor age were consistent risk factors for post-ICU depression, and severity of illness at ICU admission was consistently not a risk factor. Early post-ICU depressive symptoms were a strong risk factor for subsequent depressive symptoms. Post-ICU depressive symptoms were associated with substantially lower HRQOL. Conclusions: Depressive symptoms are common in general ICU survivors and negatively impact HRQOL. Future studies should address how factors related to individual patients, critical illness and post-ICU recovery are associated with depression in ICU survivors. © 2009 Springer-Verlag.

References Powered by Scopus

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (Sf-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection

30868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

9215Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Functioning and Well-being of Depressed Patients: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study

2765Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davydow, D. S., Gifford, J. M., Desai, S. V., Bienvenu, O. J., & Needham, D. M. (2009, May). Depression in general intensive care unit survivors: A systematic review. Intensive Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1396-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 91

62%

Researcher 27

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 17

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 114

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 32

19%

Psychology 20

12%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free