Story cloze evaluator: Vector space representation evaluation by predicting what happens next

24Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The main intrinsic evaluation for vector space representation has been focused on textual similarity, where the task is to predict how semantically similar two words or sentences are. We propose a novel framework, Story Cloze Evaluator, for evaluating vector representations which goes beyond textual similarity and captures the notion of predicting what should happen next given a context. This evaluation methodology is simple to run, scalable, reproducible by the community, non-subjective, 100% agreeable by human, and challenging to the state-of-theart models, which makes it a promising new framework for further investment of the representation learning community.

References Powered by Scopus

Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data

1666Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A corpus and cloze evaluation for deeper understanding of commonsense stories

556Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation methods for unsupervised word embeddings

419Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A knowledge-enhanced pretraining model for commonsense story generation

188Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Story ending generation with incremental encoding and commonsense knowledge

125Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

T-CVaE: Transformer-based conditioned variational autoencoder for story completion

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mostafazadeh, N., Vanderwende, L., Yih, W. T., Kohli, P., & Allen, J. (2016). Story cloze evaluator: Vector space representation evaluation by predicting what happens next. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 24–29). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w16-2505

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

66%

Researcher 9

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 36

73%

Linguistics 7

14%

Engineering 4

8%

Neuroscience 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free