Additive Manufacturing and Supply Chain Configuration: Modelling and Performance Evaluation

7Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: the aim of the study is to compare the performance of different supply chain configurations adopting Additive Manufacturing. Five input factors have been varied with the aim of testing the response of the supply chain to different starting conditions. In order to evaluate the supply chain performance, a set of key performance indicators have been identified considering both manufacturing and logistic processes. Design/methodology/approach: A discrete event simulation model has been developed in order to reproduce the behavior of the players according to their role in the supply chain. Different supply chain configurations have been modelled to assess the performance of the solution combined with different input factors. Many scenarios have been tested with the aim of identifying suitable applications of the additive technology. Findings: in general, the decentralized configuration has better logistic performance than the centralized supply chain. In fact, it is more flexible, suitable for high service levels, and less affected by the variability of the demand. However, when the distances among players are very short and the average demand is low, the benefits in adopting a decentralized configuration are very limited. Concerning the performance of the production phase, the centralized structure allows providing a better capacity utilization, exploiting the potential of a High-cost machine with higher production camera volume and speed. Practical implications: the outcomes obtained allow deriving some useful guidelines, which could help practitioners to identify a suitable application of the additive technology. Originality/value: first, the model provides a quantitative evaluation. Moreover, the study analyzes the performance of the additive technology combined with different supply chain configurations. This is a strong point since it is well known that emerging manufacturing technologies can affect the structure and the performance of the whole supply chain.

References Powered by Scopus

The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics

1210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation

638Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain

593Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Additive manufacturing in green supply chains: A parametric model for life cycle assessment and cost

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Expanding the horizons of metal additive manufacturing: A comprehensive multi-objective optimization model incorporating sustainability for SMEs

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Additive manufacturing in the supply chain

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rinaldi, M., Caterino, M., & Macchiaroli, R. (2022). Additive Manufacturing and Supply Chain Configuration: Modelling and Performance Evaluation. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 15(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3590

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

53%

Researcher 4

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 13

68%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

26%

Linguistics 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0