Beauty, elegance, grace, and sexiness compared

21Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Beauty is the single most frequently and most broadly used aesthetic virtue term. The present study aimed at providing higher conceptual resolution to the broader notion of beauty by comparing it with three closely related aesthetically evaluative concepts which are likewise lexicalized across many languages: elegance, grace(fulness), and sexiness. We administered a variety of questionnaires that targeted perceptual qualia, cognitive and affective evaluations, as well as specific object properties that are associated with beauty, elegance, grace, and sexiness in personal looks, movements, objects of design, and other domains. This allowed us to reveal distinct and highly nuanced profiles of how a beautiful, elegant, graceful, and sexy appearance is subjectively perceived. As aesthetics is all about nuances, the fine-grained conceptual analysis of the four target concepts of our study provides crucial distinctions for future research.

References Powered by Scopus

Bayes factors

12719Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research

6223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis

6196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Why and How Should Cognitive Science Care about Aesthetics?

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intense Beauty Requires Intense Pleasure

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of aging on facial attractiveness: An empirical and computational investigation

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Kegel, V., Knoop, C. A., & Schlotz, W. (2019). Beauty, elegance, grace, and sexiness compared. PLoS ONE, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218728

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

41%

Researcher 5

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 7

47%

Computer Science 4

27%

Neuroscience 2

13%

Social Sciences 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 52

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free