Children’s experiences of the family talk intervention when a parent is cared for in palliative home care—A feasibility study

10Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of the family talk intervention (FTI) and its acceptability to dependent children when a parent is cared for in palliative home care. The main goal of FTI is to increase family communication about the illness. The present paper derives from a pilot study and is based on 25 children’s reports, involving both questionnaires and interviews, after participation. A majority of the children appreciated the structure and content of FTI. They felt seen, heard, and acknowledged by the interventionists and recommended FTI to other children in similar situations.

References Powered by Scopus

Three approaches to qualitative content analysis

29525Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance

7030Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health

2573Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Children and adolescents’ preferences for support when living with a dying parent – An integrative review

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Family bonding as a result of the family talk intervention in pediatric oncology: Siblings’ experiences

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The meaning of being a visiting child of a seriously ill parent receiving care at the ICU

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eklund, R., Jalmsell, L., Kreicbergs, U., Alvariza, A., & Lövgren, M. (2022). Children’s experiences of the family talk intervention when a parent is cared for in palliative home care—A feasibility study. Death Studies, 46(7), 1655–1666. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1829747

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

17%

Researcher 2

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 9

53%

Psychology 5

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

12%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0