The Philippine Sex Workers Collective: Struggling to be heard, not saved

15Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Philippine Sex Workers Collective is an organisation of current and former sex workers who reject the criminalisation of sex work and the dominant portrayal of sex workers as victims. Based on my interviews with leaders of the Collective and fifty other sex workers in Metro Manila, I argue in this paper that a range of contextual constraints limits the ability of Filipino sex workers to effectively organise and lobby for their rights. For example, the Collective cannot legally register because of the criminalisation of sex work, and this impacts their ability to access funding and recruit members. The structural configuration of the Philippines’ Inter-Agency Council Against Trafficking incentivises civil society organisations to adhere to a unified position on sex work as violence against women. The stigma against sex work in a predominantly Catholic country is another constraint. Recently, President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs has been weaponised by some members of the police to harass sex workers. Finally, I reflect on strategies the Collective could adopt to navigate the limited space they have for representation, such as crucial partnerships, outreach work, and legal remedies.

References Powered by Scopus

Sociology of sex work

363Citations
478Readers
Get full text
31Citations
50Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parmanand, S. (2019). The Philippine Sex Workers Collective: Struggling to be heard, not saved. Anti-Trafficking Review, 2019(12), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201219124

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

56%

Psychology 2

22%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

11%

Arts and Humanities 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 58

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0