Biomechanical comparison of Tibial-sided supplemental fixation techniques in Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a commercially available suture anchor and a screw post for supplemental tibial fixation of a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft at time zero. We hypothesized that supplemental fixation using a suture anchor would demonstrate similar biomechanical performance in comparison with a screw post. Methods: Sixteen fresh frozen, healthy human cadaveric knees underwent BTB autograft harvest, placement, and primary tibial-sided interference screw fixation using a standardized technique performed by a single surgeon. Specimens were randomly assigned to one of two tibial-sided supplemental fixation groups (suture anchor or screw post), yielding eight specimens in each group. Each specimen was affixed to a custom loading apparatus, with the tibial tunnel aligned in a vertical position that allowed for parallel “worst-case scenario” loading and eliminated loading variation due to tibial tunnel angle. Grafts were pretensioned to 30 N and biomechanical performance was compared with respect to cyclical loading between 50–250 N for 500 cycles at 0.5 Hz and pull-to-failure loading at 60 mm/min. Results: The suture anchor and screw post supplemental constructs demonstrated similar performance with respect to all biomechanical parameters assessed, including yield strength (294.0 N [IQR 267.2–304.2 N] versus 332.1 N [IQR 313.8–350.4 N]; P = 0.079) and ultimate strength (330.1 N [IQR 306.9–418.7 N] versus 374.7 N [IQR 362.0–387.3 N]; P = 0.3798). However, of the eight original specimens in each group, one suture anchor specimen (12.5%) and six metallic screw post specimens (75%) failed during cyclical testing and were unable to undergo displacement and load to failure testing. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that supplemental tibial-sided fixation of a BTB ACL graft with a suture anchor has similar loading characteristics or load-to-failure strength when compared to supplemental fixation with a screw post construct. Study design: Laboratory Controlled Study. Level of evidence: Basic Science Study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hurwit, D. J., Habet, N. A., Meade, J. D., Berk, A. N., Young, B. L., Odum, S., … Saltzman, B. M. (2023). Biomechanical comparison of Tibial-sided supplemental fixation techniques in Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee, 41, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2022.12.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free