Characterization of MSB synapses in dissociated hippocampal culture with simultaneous pre- and postsynaptic live microscopy

7Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Multisynaptic boutons (MSBs) are presynaptic boutons in contact with multiple postsynaptic partners. Although MSB synapses have been studied with static imaging techniques such as electron microscopy (EM), the dynamics of individual MSB synapses have not been directly evaluated. It is known that the number of MSB synapses increases with synaptogenesis and plasticity but the formation, behavior, and fate of individual MSB synapses remains largely unknown. To address this, we developed a means of live imaging MSB synapses to observe them directly over time. With time lapse confocal microscopy of GFP-filled dendrites in contact with VAMP2-DsRed-labeled boutons, we recorded both MSBs and their contacting spines hourly over 15 or more hours. Our live microscopy showed that, compared to spines contacting single synaptic boutons (SSBs), MSB-contacting spines exhibit elevated dynamic behavior. These results are consistent with the idea that MSBs serve as intermediates in synaptic development and plasticity. © 2011 Reilly et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Apparent multisynaptic contacts in immunolabeled cultured neurons. (A, left) LSCM z-stack projection of immunolabeled presynaptic marker vGlut1 (red) and postsynaptic marker PSD95 (green) along a dendritic segment. Scale bar is 2 mm. (A, middle and right) Enlarged examples of vGlut1 puncta in contact with single (middle) and multiple PSD95 puncta (right). Scale bar is 0.5 mm. (B, top) Number of vGlut1 and PSD95 double immunolabeled multiple contacts per neuron as a percentage of all synaptic contacts per neuron with increasing time in culture. Contacts were defined as abutting or overlapping puncta. Fluorescence intensity was normalized across images by adjusting the gain during image acquisition such that the centers of the puncta were at ceiling. Neurons at 25 and 27 DIV were counted together as a single time point. ‘‘Opposite’’ is the number of the synaptic contacts in the arrangement opposite of MSB synapses (PSD95 puncta in contact with multiple vGlut1 puncta) as a percentage of all synaptic profiles. (B, bottom) Average number of double immunolabeled vGlut1 and PSD95 synaptic contacts per neuron with increasing time in culture. Neurons at 25 and 27 DIV were counted together as a single time point. (C) LSCM z-stack projection of a GFP-filled dendritic segment (green) with immunolabeled presynaptic marker SV2 (red). Arrows point to SV2 puncta in contact with multiple GFP-filled spines. Scale bar is 2 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026478.g001
  • Figure 2. LSCM spine detection and CLEM verification of MSB-contacting spines. (A, top) 3D reconstruction of CLEM-verified MSBcontacting spines boxed in (B). Scale bar is 0.5 mm. (A, bottom) Single section EM of the spines boxed in (B, top). Bouton is shaded red. Spines are shaded green. Arrowheads point to postsynaptic densities. Carets point to presynaptic vesicles. (B, top) Deconvolved LSCM z-stack projection of a dendritic segment. A CLEM-verified MSB spine pair is boxed. Scale bar is 2 mm. (B, middle) NeuronStudio detection of spines and labeling with identification numbers. The blue line runs along the dendrite automatically traced by NeuronStudio. (B, bottom) 3D reconstruction of the same segment. See also Figure S1. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026478.g002
  • Figure 3. Spatial properties of MSB spine pairs. (A) Average spine head distances for 18 MSB-contacting and 18 control spine pairs. Distances were measured between the centers of mass of the spine heads. Error bars represent standard deviation. p = 461025 by a one-tailed t test. (B) Spine head distance distribution of the MSB and control spine pairs. (C) Spine orientation distribution of 22 MSB and 22 control spine pairs. Spine orientation was manually determined as angled towards for heads nearer than bases, parallel for heads and bases equidistant, or angled away for heads further than bases. The 22 control pairs used for the orientation analysis are different because orientation was not manually discernable in the original 18 pairs. p = 0.006 by a x2 test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026478.g003
  • Figure 4. Long-term live LSCM of GFP-filled dendritic spines contacting VAMP2-DsRed-labeled boutons in dissociated cultured neurons. (A) Example showing many clear spinous synaptic contacts over 15 hours. Arrowheads point to clearly labeled spinous synapses that persisted over the entire duration. Scale bar is 10 mm. (B) Examples showing MSB and SSB synapses over 11 hours. Top panels (0 h) show live LSCM zstack projections of GFP-filled dendrites (green) and VAMP2-DsRed-labeled boutons (red). In the bottom panels (0–11 h), the GFP detection channels are shown separated for clarity in discerning the dendritic spines. (Left panels) Arrow and arrowhead point to spines of an MSB spine pair. The spine with the arrow is persistent and stable while the one with the arrowhead is unstable and retracts. (Right panels) Arrow points to a persistent stable SSB-contacting spine. Scale bar is 5 mm. See also Movies S1, S2, and S3. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026478.g004
  • Figure 5. MSB-contacting spines are more dynamic than SSBcontacting spines. (A) Average dominance rates for MSB and SSB spine pairs. The dominance rate is a measure of the change in size difference over time between the dominant and nondominant spine. (B) Average R2 values for the dominance rates of the MSB and SSB spine pairs. The R2 values are a measure of the strength of the dominance trends. See the Methods section for further explanation of these calculations. For all graphs, error bars represent standard deviation. p = 0.001 for dominance rate (A) and p = 0.002 for R2 value (B) by onetailed t tests. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026478.g005
  • Figure 6. The dynamics exhibited by MSB-contacting spines is suggestive of competition between the spines. Left panels show the first (0 hour) and last (15 hour) time points from the time lapse LSCM image series of the MSB synapses analyzed. Arrows point to dominant spines. Arrowheads point to nondominant spines. In (D), the 1 hour time point is also shown as it more clearly shows the contact between the MSB and the nondominant spine. Due to presynaptic vesicle turnover, the VAMP2-DsRed bouton labeling is occasionally absent. Far right top panel is an enlargement of the MSB spine pair in (A) showing the rightmost tip of the spine of the left in abutting contact with the red bouton. Center panels are graphs of difference indices over time, calculated from the integrated densities of the spine heads (right panels). The slopes of the linear trend lines of the difference indices represent the dominance rates. Right panels are graphs of the integrated densities over time. See the Methods section for further explanation of these calculations. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026478.g006
  • Figure 7. Randomly paired SSB spines do not exhibit dynamics suggestive of competition. Panel descriptions are the same as for Figure 7 except left panels show SSB synapses and their randomly paired spines. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026478.g007

References Powered by Scopus

Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex

1594Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transient and persistent dendritic spines in the neocortex in vivo

946Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

LTP promotes formation of multiple spine synapses between a single axon terminal and a dendrite

868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evidence for Alzheimer’s disease-linked synapse loss and compensation in mouse and human hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons

84Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dissociated neurons and glial cells derived from rat inferior colliculi after digestion with papain

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiple spine boutons are formed after long-lasting LTP in the awake rat

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reilly, J. E., Hanson, H. H., Fernández-Monreal, M., Wearne, S. L., Hof, P. R., & Phillips, G. R. (2011). Characterization of MSB synapses in dissociated hippocampal culture with simultaneous pre- and postsynaptic live microscopy. PLoS ONE, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026478

Readers over time

‘11‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

59%

Researcher 8

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17

53%

Neuroscience 11

34%

Engineering 2

6%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0