Confronting 'chaos': a qualitative study assessing public health officials' perceptions of the factors affecting Tanzania's COVID-19 vaccine rollout

8Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives Mass COVID-19 vaccination in Africa is required to end the pandemic. In low-income settings, street-level bureaucrats (SLBs), or public officials who interact directly with citizens, are typically responsible for carrying out vaccination plans and earning community confidence in vaccines. The study interviewed SLBs to assess their perceptions of the factors affecting COVID-19 vaccination rollout in Tanzania. Methods We interviewed 50 SLBs (19 rural; 31 urban) responsible for implementing COVID-19 vaccination microplans across four diverse regions and districts of Tanzania in September 2021. Moreover, we conducted six in-depth interviews with non-governmental organisation representatives and seven focus group discussions with health facility governing committees. We asked for their perceptions of factors facilitating and challenging vaccine rollout according to three preidentified domains: political, health system and community. We analysed translated transcripts using a thematic analysis approach. Results Political factors facilitating mass vaccination included the executive leadership change from a denialist president to a president who accepted vaccines and promoted transparency. Global integration, commercially and politically, also motivated vaccine acceptance. Political challenges included community confusion that emerged from the consecutive presidents' divergent communications and messaging by prominent religious antivaccination leaders. Health system factors facilitating vaccination included scaling up of immunisation sites and campaigns. Urban district officials reported greater access to vaccination sites, compared with rural officials. Limited financial resources for paying healthcare workers and for transport fuel and a lack of COVID-19 testing compromised mass vaccination. Furthermore, SLBs reported being inadequately trained on COVID-19 vaccine benefits and side effects. Having community sources of accurate information was critical to mass vaccination. Challenges at the community level included patriarchal gender dynamics, low risk perception, disinformation that the vaccine has satanic elements, and lack of trust in coronavirus vaccines. Conclusion Mass COVID-19 vaccination in Tanzania will require greater resources and investment in training SLBs to mitigate mistrust, overcome misinformation, and engage communities.

References Powered by Scopus

High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution

2087Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rapid epidemic expansion of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in southern Africa

1170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Challenges in ensuring global access to COVID-19 vaccines: production, affordability, allocation, and deployment

907Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Social Ecological Model: A Framework for Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake among Healthcare Workers—A Scoping Review

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantitative Synthesis of Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Vaccine Hesitancy in 185 Countries

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding Sociodemographic Factors and Reasons Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitance among Adults in Tanzania: A Mixed-Method Approach

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamanis, T., Carlitz, R., Gonyea, O., Skaff, S., Kisanga, N., & Mollel, H. (2023). Confronting “chaos”: a qualitative study assessing public health officials’ perceptions of the factors affecting Tanzania’s COVID-19 vaccine rollout. BMJ Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065081

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

64%

Researcher 6

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 7

29%

Social Sciences 6

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

21%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free