Memory for the frequency of occurrence of karate techniques: A comparison of experts and novices

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Karate techniques were presented in a pattern to a group of karate students, half experts and half novices. The frequency with which these techniques appeared varied from 0 through 11. The experts and novices did not differ in the accuracy with which they judged the frequency of the techniques, but the experts showed a significant advantage over the novices in recalling the techniques. The results indicate that memory for the frequency of observed actions is not affected by subject variables such as prior knowledge, a finding consistent with the conclusion that memory for frequency is based on automatic processes. © 1992, Psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Perception in chess

2993Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automatic and effortful processes in memory

2018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence

572Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Weaving the fabric of social interaction: Articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition

134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Deliberate practice and expertise in the martial arts: The role of context in motor recall

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sport psychology: A student’s handbook

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bedon, B. G., & Howard, D. V. (1992). Memory for the frequency of occurrence of karate techniques: A comparison of experts and novices. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30(2), 117–119. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330413

Readers over time

‘12‘15‘16‘17‘19‘20‘2200.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 3

43%

Psychology 2

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 12

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0