Global Morphology of Ionospheric Scintillations

551Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Stilting with post World War II studies of fading of radio star sources and continuing with fading of satellite signals of Sputnik, vast quantities of data have built up on the effect of ionospheric irregularities on signals from beyond the F layer. The review attempts to organize the available amplitude and phase scintillation data into equatorial, middle-, and high-latitude morphologies. The effect of magnetic activity, solar sunspot cycle, and time of day is shown for each of these three latitudinal sectors. The effect of the very high levels of solar flux during the past sunspot maximum of 1979-1981 is stressed. During these years unusually high levels of scintillation were noted near the peak of the Appleton equatorial anomaly (~±15° from the magnetic equator) as well as over polar latitudes. New data on phase fluctuations are summarized for the auroral zone with its sheet-like irregularity structure. © 1982 IEEE

References Powered by Scopus

A power law phase screen model for ionospheric scintillation: 1. Weak scatter

407Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the variation of radio star and satellite scintillations with zenith angle

290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early results from the DNA Wideband satellite experiment—Complex‐signal scintillation

248Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

GPS and ionospheric scintillations

592Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

C/NOFS: A mission to forecast scintillations

253Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A survey of ionospheric effects on space-based radar

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aarons, J. (1982). Global Morphology of Ionospheric Scintillations. Proceedings of the IEEE, 70(4), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1982.12314

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 39

67%

Researcher 13

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 24

41%

Physics and Astronomy 21

36%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 12

21%

Computer Science 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0