Towards the verification of safety-critical autonomous systems in dynamic environments

18Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is an increasing necessity to deploy autonomous systems in highly heterogeneous, dynamic environments, e.g. service robots in hospitals or autonomous cars on highways. Due to the uncertainty in these environments, the verification results obtained with respect to the system and environment models at design-time might not be transferable to the system behavior at run time. For autonomous systems operating in dynamic environments, safety of motion and collision avoidance are critical requirements. With regard to these requirements, Maček et al. [6] define the passive safety property, which requires that no collision can occur while the autonomous system is moving. To verify this property, we adopt a two phase process which combines static verification methods, used at design time, with dynamic ones, used at run time. In the design phase, we exploit UPPAAL to formalize the autonomous system and its environment as timed automata and the safety property as TCTL formula and to verify the correctness of these models with respect to this property. For the runtime phase, we build a monitor to check whether the assumptions made at design time are also correct at run time. If the current system observations of the environment do not correspond to the initial system assumptions, the monitor sends feedback to the system and the system enters a passive safe state.

References Powered by Scopus

A Tutorial on UPPAAL

1230Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Differential dynamic logic for hybrid systems

314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A case study on runtime monitoring of an autonomous research vehicle (ARV) system

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Formal specification and verification of autonomous robotic systems: A survey

208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assuring the Machine Learning Lifecycle: Desiderata, Methods, and Challenges

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Robotics and integrated formal methods: Necessity meets opportunity

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aniculaesei, A., Arnsberger, D., Howar, F., & Rausch, A. (2016). Towards the verification of safety-critical autonomous systems in dynamic environments. In Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, EPTCS (Vol. 232, pp. 79–90). Open Publishing Association. https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.232.10

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

72%

Researcher 7

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 15

56%

Engineering 10

37%

Design 1

4%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free