Contribution of frailty markers in explaining differences among individuals in five samples of older persons

42Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There has been little research on the relative importance of frailty markers. The objective was to investigate the association among seven frailty domains (nutrition, physical activity, mobility, strength, energy, cognition, and mood) and their relative contribution in explaining differences among individuals in five samples of older persons. Methods: Data from five studies of aging were analyzed using multiple correspondence analysis. Aggregation of frailty markers was evaluated using graphical output. Decomposition of variability was used to assess the relative contribution of each marker in each sample. Results were combined across the samples to assess the average contribution. Results: Frailty markers were found to consistently aggregate in each sample, suggesting a possible underlying construct. Physical strength had the highest contribution on average in explaining differences among individuals. Mobility and energy also had large contributions. Nutrition and cognition had the smallest contributions. Conclusions: Our results provide further evidence supporting the notion that frailty domains may belong to a common construct. Physical strength may be the most important discriminating characteristic. © 2012 The Author.

References Powered by Scopus

"Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician

77645Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

45166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (Sf-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection

30898Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Frailty consensus: A call to action

2927Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Frailty and cognitive impairment-A review of the evidence and causal mechanisms

569Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: cohort update 2016 and major findings

170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sourial, N., Bergman, H., Karunananthan, S., Wolfson, C., Guralnik, J., Payette, H., … Béland, F. (2012). Contribution of frailty markers in explaining differences among individuals in five samples of older persons. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 67(11), 1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gls084

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 43

69%

Researcher 12

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 30

58%

Psychology 10

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

13%

Social Sciences 5

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free