A zinc-iron redox-flow battery under $100 per kW h of system capital cost

203Citations
Citations of this article
246Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are one of the most promising scalable electricity-storage systems to address the intermittency issues of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar. The prerequisite for RFBs to be economically viable and widely employed is their low cost. Here we present a new zinc-iron (Zn-Fe) RFB based on double-membrane triple-electrolyte design that is estimated to have under $100 per kW h system capital cost. Such a low cost is achieved by a combination of inexpensive redox materials (i.e., zinc and iron) and high cell performance (e.g., 676 mW cm-2 power density). Engineering of the cell structure is found to be critical to enable the high power density. Our cost model shows that a Zn-Fe RFB demonstrates the lowest cost among some notable RFBs and could reach the 2023 cost target set by the U.S. Department of Energy ($150 per kW h).

References Powered by Scopus

Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices

12751Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electrochemical energy storage for green grid

4612Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Energy storage systems-Characteristics and comparisons

1918Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Redox-Flow Batteries: From Metals to Organic Redox-Active Materials

825Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rechargeable Batteries for Grid Scale Energy Storage

789Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Design Strategies for High-Energy-Density Aqueous Zinc Batteries

560Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gong, K., Ma, X., Conforti, K. M., Kuttler, K. J., Grunewald, J. B., Yeager, K. L., … Yan, Y. (2015). A zinc-iron redox-flow battery under $100 per kW h of system capital cost. Energy and Environmental Science, 8(10), 2941–2945. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee02315g

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 98

67%

Researcher 36

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 43

33%

Chemistry 41

31%

Energy 25

19%

Chemical Engineering 22

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0