Predicting the physiological effect of revascularization in serially diseased coronary arteries: Clinical validation of a novel CT coronary angiography-based technique

59Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is commonly used to assess the functional significance of coronary artery disease but is theoretically limited in evaluating individual stenoses in serially diseased vessels. We sought to characterize the accuracy of assessing individual stenoses in serial disease using invasive FFR pullback and the noninvasive equivalent, fractional flow reserve by computed tomography (FFRCT). We subsequently describe and test the accuracy of a novel noninvasive FFRCT-derived percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) planning tool (FFRCT-P) in predicting the true significance of individual stenoses. Methods and Results: Patients with angiographic serial coronary artery disease scheduled for PCI were enrolled and underwent prospective coronary CT angiography with conventional FFRCT-derived post hoc for each vessel and stenosis (FFRCT). Before PCI, the invasive hyperemic pressure-wire pullback was performed to derive the apparent FFR contribution of each stenosis (FFRpullback). The true FFR attributable to individual lesions (FFRtrue) was then measured following PCI of one of the lesions. The predictive accuracy of FFRpullback, FFRCT, and the novel technique (FFRCT-P) was then assessed against FFRtrue. From the 24 patients undergoing the protocol, 19 vessels had post hoc FFRCT and FFRCT-P calculation. When assessing the distal effect of all lesions, FFRCT correlated moderately well with invasive FFR (R=0.71; P<0.001). For lesion-specific assessment, there was significant underestimation of FFRtrue using FFRpullback (mean discrepancy, 0.06±0.05; P<0.001, representing a 42% error) and conventional trans-lesional FFRCT (0.05±0.06; P<0.001, 37% error). Using FFRCT-P, stenosis underestimation was significantly reduced to a 7% error (0.01±0.05; P<0.001). Conclusions: FFR pullback and conventional FFRCT significantly underestimate true stenosis contribution in serial coronary artery disease. A novel noninvasive FFRCT-based PCI planner tool more accurately predicts the true FFR contribution of each stenosis in serial coronary artery disease.

References Powered by Scopus

Deep learning

63439Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention

3526Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease

2292Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography From Clinical Uses to Emerging Technologies: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurement of Hyperemic Pullback Pressure Gradients to Characterize Patterns of Coronary Atherosclerosis

175Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coronary ct angiography-derived fractional flow reserve testing in patients with stable coronary artery disease: Recommendations on interpretation and reporting

95Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Modi, B. N., Sankaran, S., Kim, H. J., Ellis, H., Rogers, C., Taylor, C. A., … Perera, D. (2019). Predicting the physiological effect of revascularization in serially diseased coronary arteries: Clinical validation of a novel CT coronary angiography-based technique. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007577

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

65%

Researcher 5

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 15

58%

Engineering 7

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

12%

Materials Science 1

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 57

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0