Sustaining effective research/operational collaborations: Lessons learned from a National Partnered Evaluation Initiative

6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Effective research-operational partnerships require that researchers ask questions targeting top clinical operational priorities. However, disconnects exist between healthcare researchers and operational leadership that result in significant delays between discovery and implementation of breakthroughs in healthcare. Objective: Using the Veterans Health Administration Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Partnered Evaluation Initiative (PEI) as a case study, we identified relationship characteristics of collaborative research projects designed to address the research/operations gap. Methods: An interview guide was developed focusing on areas identified as essential for effective research/operational partnerships from previous research. Investigators (N = 14) and their operational leadership partners (N = 14) representing 16 PEIs were interviewed by phone related to the characteristics of their partnerships. All investigators had had advanced degrees in fields related to healthcare delivery and administration and were affiliated with VHA research institutes. All operational partners served in national leadership roles within VHA operational offices. Detailed interview notes collected from interviews were coded and themes identified using thematic analysis. Results: Eight relationship themes were identified: leadership support, shared understanding, investment, trust, agreement on products, mutual benefit, adaptability, and collaboration. Most operational and investigator partners discussed the importance of leadership support, shared understanding, investment, trust and product agreement, suggesting that these may be more essential than other areas in supporting effective operations/research collaborations. One theme (mutual benefit) was mentioned by most investigators but only some operations partners, pointing to potential differences related to this area between the two groups. Facilitators of effective collaboration included obtaining formal leadership support, developing a shared understanding of partner priorities and needs, ongoing discussions about resource needs, expanding collaborations beyond the initial project, having a clearly defined plan, planning for flexibility, plans for regular communication, and active participation in project meetings. Conclusions: Partnership characteristics that facilitate effective collaboration include leadership support, shared understanding of planned work, investment, trust, and product agreement. Future research should assess the overall impact of partnered approaches to healthcare improvement within other large healthcare systems.

References Powered by Scopus

Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations

6756Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques

2246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Focus on research methods real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research

557Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Funding Learning Health System Research: Challenges and Strategies

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How alignment between health systems and their embedded research units contributes to system learning

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Rapid Response Teams: A learning health system approach to addressing emerging health system challenges

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bowersox, N. W., Williams, V., Kawentel, L., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2021). Sustaining effective research/operational collaborations: Lessons learned from a National Partnered Evaluation Initiative. Healthcare, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100588

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 1

25%

Engineering 1

25%

Mathematics 1

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0