Endoscopic perforation of the colon: Lessons from a 10-year study

345Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence, clinical features, and management of endoscopic colon perforations in a large number of patients at a major medical teaching center. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of all patients with colon perforations from endoscopy over a 10-yr period. RESULTS: A total of 10,486 colonoscopies were performed over a 10-yr period. There were 20 (0.19%) perforations and two (0.019%) deaths related to colonoscopy and two perforations with no deaths in 49,501 sigmoidoscopies (0.004%). The majority of perforations (65%) occurred in the sigmoid colon. The mean age of the patients was 72 yr (range, 48-87 yr). Multivariate analysis using gender and age showed that female gender was an independent predictor of a higher risk of perforation (p < 0.05). Electrocautery injury (36%) and mechanical injury (32%) from the tip and shaft of the endoscope were the major causes for perforation. Most patients (91%) presented within 48 h of endoscopy. Nine patients (47%) required a surgical resection with primary anastomosis; seven (37%) required a simple closure. The average hospital length of stay was 7.7 ± 2.8 days. Although trainee endoscopists were involved in only 20% of the colonoscopies performed, eight (40%) perforations occurred while the training fellow was involved in the case. However, this increased risk of perforation with a training fellow was not statistically significant (p = 0.625). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy can result in significant morbidity and carries a small risk of death. Sigmoidoscopy has lower risk. The following situations may represent increased risk to colonoscopy patients: unusual difficulty in traversing the sigmoid colon; difficult examinations in female patients, and difficult examinations performed by trainee physicians.

References Powered by Scopus

Towards safer colonoscopy: A report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies

448Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Colonoscopy: A prospective report of complications

372Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women?

242Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

918Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality indicators for colonoscopy

853Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

695Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, M. L., Pasha, T. M., & Leighton, J. A. (2000). Endoscopic perforation of the colon: Lessons from a 10-year study. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 95(12), 3418–3422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9270(00)02149-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

28%

Researcher 4

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 21

84%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

8%

Computer Science 1

4%

Engineering 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free