A probabilistic interpretation of motion correlation selection techniques

5Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Motion correlation interfaces are those that present targets moving in diferent patterns, which the user can select by matching their motion. In this paper, we re-formulate the task of target selection as a probabilistic inference problem. We demonstrate that previous interaction techniques can be modelled using a Bayesian approach and that how modelling the selection task as transmission of information can help us make explicit the assumptions behind similarity measures. We propose ways of incorporating uncertainty into the decision-making process and demonstrate how the concept of entropy can illuminate the measurement of the quality of a design. We apply these techniques in a case study and suggest guidelines for future work.

References Powered by Scopus

Understanding correlation: Factors that affect the size of r

346Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pursuits: Spontaneous interaction with displays based on smooth pursuit eye movement and moving targets

235Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Orbits: Gaze interaction for smart watches using smooth pursuit eye movements

183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Vergence Matching: Inferring Attention to Objects in 3D Environments for Gaze-Assisted Selection

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards Interaction Design with Active Inference: A Case Study on Noisy Ordinal Selection

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Detection of visual pursuits using 1D convolutional neural networks

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Velloso, E., & Morimoto, C. H. (2021). A probabilistic interpretation of motion correlation selection techniques. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445184

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Researcher 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

50%

Psychology 2

25%

Design 1

13%

Arts and Humanities 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free