Are prophylactic and therapeutic target concentrations different?: The case of lopinavir-ritonavir or lamivudine administered to infants for prevention of mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission during breastfeeding

7Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The ANRS 12174 trial assessed the efficacy and tolerance of lopinavir (LPV)-ritonavir (LPV/r) prophylaxis versus those of lamivudine (3TC) prophylaxis administered to breastfed infants whose HIV-infected mothers were not on antiretroviral therapy. In this substudy, we assessed LPV/r and 3TC pharmacokinetics to evaluate the percentage of infants with therapeutic plasma concentrations and to discuss these data in the context of a prophylactic treatment. Infants from the South African trial site underwent blood sampling for pharmacokinetic study at weeks 6, 26, and 38 of life. We applied a Bayesian approach to derive the 3TC and LPV pharmacokinetic parameters on the basis of previously published pharmacokinetic models for HIV-infected children. We analyzed 114 LPV and 180 3TC plasma concentrations from 69 infants and 92 infants, respectively. A total of 30 LPV and 20 3TC observations were considered missing doses and discarded from the Bayesian analysis. The overall population analysis showed that 30 to 40% of the infants did not reach therapeutic targets, regardless of treatment group. The median LPV trough concentrations at weeks 6, 26, and 38 were 2.8 mg/liter (interquartile range [IQR], 1.7 to 4.4 mg/liter), 5.6 mg/liter (IQR, 3.2 to 7.7 mg/liter), and 3.4 mg/liter (IQR, 2.3 to 7.3 mg/liter), respectively. The median 3TC area under the curve from 0 to 12 h after the last drug intake were 5.6 mg·h/liter (IQR, 4.1 to 7.8 mg·h/liter), 5.9 mg·h/liter (IQR, 5.1 to 7.5 mg·h/liter), and 7.3 mg·h/liter (IQR, 4.9 to 8.5 mg·h/liter) at weeks 6, 26, and 38, respectively. Use of the therapeutic doses recommended by the WHO would have resulted in a higher proportion of infants achieving the targets. However, no HIV-1 infection was reported among these infants. These results suggest that the prophylactic targets for both 3TC and LPV may be lower than the therapeutic ones. For treatment, the WHO dosing guidelines should be suitable to maintain values above the therapeutic pharmacokinetic targets in most infants. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00640263.)

References Powered by Scopus

The ontogeny of drug metabolism enzymes and implications for adverse drug events

329Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infected pregnant women and their neonates

184Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Low nevirapine plasma concentrations predict virological failure in an unselected HIV-1-infected population

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Early initiation of antiviral therapy contributes to a rapid and significant loss of serum HBsAg in infantile-onset hepatitis B

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lopinavir-ritonavir impairs adrenal function in infants

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Growth in HIV-1-exposed but uninfected infants treated with lopinavir–ritonavir versus lamivudine: a secondary analysis of the ANRS 12174 trial

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foissac, F., Blume, J., Tréluyer, J. M., Tylleskär, T., Kankasa, C., Meda, N., … Hirt, D. (2017). Are prophylactic and therapeutic target concentrations different?: The case of lopinavir-ritonavir or lamivudine administered to infants for prevention of mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission during breastfeeding. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 61(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01869-16

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

59%

Researcher 10

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 19

56%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

29%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

9%

Psychology 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free