Analysis of homogel uniaxial compression strength on bio grouting material

13Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study analyzed uniaxial compression strength over time by preparing a homogel specimen from a bio grouting material, a cement-like form produced by environment-friendly microbial reactions. Among chemical grouting methods, the most commonly used method is the Labile Waterglass method. In this study, the homogel uniaxial compressive strength of Labile Waterglass (LW) injection material and that of bio grouting material were measured and analyzed. In order to perform the experiment, a total of 10 types of grouting mixing ratios were prepared by a combination of different materials such as Ordinary Portland Cement, Micro Cement, Bio Grouting Material and Sodium Silicate. They were cured in the air, and their homogel uniaxial compression strengths were measured on days 1, 3, 7 and 28 Based on the test results, it was confirmed that the uniaxial strength of the specimen made with Bio Grouting Material, Ordinary Portland Cement and Micro Cement was increased by more than 30% than that of the specimen only used with Ordinary Portland Cement, as a result of hydrogen-released heat reaction between calcium carbonate, the main ingredient of the bio grouting material, and calcium silicate in the cement. This indicates that the use of 30% bio-grouting material instead of cement in the grouting can be a reasonable mixing ratio to save the use of cement, leading to reduction in CO2 emission.

Figures

  • Table 1. Mixing ratios for uniaxial compressive strength test specimens for grouting materials.
  • Figure 1. Making of the bio grouting material: (a) mix the microbial solution and the sodium silicate solution; and (b) make powder (calcium carbonate) in a bowl plate.
  • Figure 4. Uniaxial compression strength graphs for OPC, micro cement and bio grouting material.
  • Table 2. Uniaxial compression strengths of OPC, micro cement and bio grouting material.
  • Figure 5. Uniaxial co pression strength graphs for OS, S and BS containing sodiu silicate o. 3.
  • Table 3. Uniaxial compression strengths of OS, MS and BS containing sodium silicate No. 3
  • Figure 7. Uniaxial compression strength of the improved micro cement.
  • Table 5. Uniaxial compression strengths of the improved micro cement.

References Powered by Scopus

Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique

1601Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bio-mediated soil improvement

1477Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear

1380Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Flexible and stretchable polyurethane/waterglass grouting material

105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of cement-based self-stress composite grouting material for reinforcing rock mass and engineering application

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review of Strength Improvements of Biocemented Soils

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, K., & Kim, D. (2016). Analysis of homogel uniaxial compression strength on bio grouting material. Materials, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9040244

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘20‘21‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

80%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

60%

Arts and Humanities 2

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

10%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0