Effects of cyclic opening and closing at low- and high-volume ventilation on bronchoalveolar lavage cytokines

150Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To examine the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury at low and high lung volumes. Design: Prospective, randomized, laboratory study. Setting: University research laboratory. Subjects: Eighty-eight adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions: Mechanical ventilation using low and high lung volumes. Measurements and Main Results: An ex vivo rat lung model was used. In study I (ventilation at low lung volumes), rat lungs (n = 40) were randomly assigned to various modes of ventilation: a) opening and closing with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; control): tidal volume 7 mL/kg and PEEP 5 cm H2O; b) opening and closing from zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP): tidal volume 7 mL/kg and PEEP 0; or c) atelectasis. Peak inspiratory pressure was monitored at the beginning and end of 3 hrs of ventilation. At the end of 3 hrs of ventilation, the lungs were lavaged, and the concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-α, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and interleukin-6 cytokines were measured in the lavage. In study II (ventilation at high volumes), rat lungs (n = 45) were randomly assigned to a) cyclic lung stretch: pressure-controlled ventilation, peak inspiratory pressure 50 cm H2O, and PEEP 8 cm H2O; b) continuous positive airway pressure at 50 cm H2O (CPAP50); or c) CPAP at the mean airway pressure of the cyclic stretch group (CPAP 31 cm H2O). Bronchoalveolar lavage cytokine concentrations (tumor necrosis factor-α, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and interleukin-6) were measured at the end of 3 hrs of ventilation. In the low volume study, there was no difference in bronchoalveolar lavage cytokine concentrations between the PEEP group and the atelectatic group. All cytokines were significantly higher in the ZEEP group compared with the atelectasis group. Macrophage inflammatory protein-2 was significantly higher in the ZEEP group compared with the PEEP group. Lung compliance, as reflected by change in peak inspiratory pressure, was also significantly worse in the ZEEP compared with the PEEP group. In the high-volume study, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 were significantly higher in the cyclic stretch group compared with the CPAP 31 group. There was no significant difference between the cytokine concentrations in the cyclic stretch group compared with the CPAP 50 group. Conclusion: We conclude that at low lung volumes, cyclic opening and closing from ZEEP leads to greater increases in bronchoalveolar lavage cytokines than atelectasis. With high-volume ventilation, over time, the degree of overdistenslon is more associated with increases in bronchoalveolar lavage cytokines than cyclic opening and closing alone.

References Powered by Scopus

What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments

4737Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons

4628Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of mechanical ventilation on inflammatory mediators in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

1637Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Lung injury after one-lung ventilation: A review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms affecting the ventilated and the collapsed lung

301Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The micromechanics of lung alveoli: structure and function of surfactant and tissue components

267Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Esophageal and transpulmonary pressures in acute respiratory failure

238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chu, E. K., Whitehead, T., & Slutsky, A. S. (2004). Effects of cyclic opening and closing at low- and high-volume ventilation on bronchoalveolar lavage cytokines. Critical Care Medicine, 32(1), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000104203.20830.AE

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

48%

Researcher 14

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 63

93%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

3%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

3%

Design 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free