Technological advances in MRI measurement of brain perfusion

33Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Measurement of brain perfusion using arterial spin labeling (ASL) or dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) based MRI has many potential important clinical applications. However, the clinical application of perfusion MRI has been limited by a number of factors, including a relatively poor spatial resolution, limited volume coverage, and low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). It is difficult to improve any of these aspects because both ASL and DSC methods require rapid image acquisition. In this report, recent methodological developments are discussed that alleviate some of these limitations and make perfusion MRI more suitable for clinical application. In particular, the availability of high magnetic field strength systems, increased gradient performance, the use of RF coil arrays and parallel imaging, and increasing pulse sequence efficiency allow for increased image acquisition speed and improved SNR. The use of parallel imaging facilitates the trade-off of SNR for increases in spatial resolution. As a demonstration, we obtained DSC and ASL perfusion images at 3.0 T and 7.0 T with multichannel RF coils and parallel imaging, which allowed us to obtain high-quality images with in-plane voxel sizes of 1.5 × 1.5 mm2.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

147Citations
174Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

83Citations
292Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duyn, J. H., Van Gelderen, P., Talagala, L., Koretsky, A., & De Zwart, J. A. (2005). Technological advances in MRI measurement of brain perfusion. In Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Vol. 22, pp. 751–753). https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20450

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

45%

Researcher 26

37%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 26

41%

Engineering 17

27%

Physics and Astronomy 11

17%

Neuroscience 10

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0