Are unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) the future of wildlife monitoring? A review of accomplishments and challenges

394Citations
Citations of this article
745Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Regular monitoring of animal populations must be established to ensure wildlife protection, especially when pressure on animals is high. The recent development of drones or unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) opens new opportunities. UASs have several advantages, including providing data at high spatial and temporal resolution, providing systematic, permanent data, having low operational costs and being low-risk for the operators. However, UASs have some constraints, such as short flight endurance. We reviewed studies in which wildlife populations were monitored by using drones, described accomplishments to date and evaluated the range of possibilities UASs offer to provide new perspectives in future research. We focused on four main topics: 1) the available systems and sensors; 2) the types of survey plan and detection possibilities; 3) contributions towards anti-poaching surveillance; and 4) legislation and ethics. We found that small fixed-wing UASs are most commonly used because these aircraft provide a viable compromise between price, logistics and flight endurance. The sensors are typically electro-optic or infrared cameras, but there is the potential to develop and test new sensors. Despite various flight plan possibilities, mostly classical line transects have been employed, and it would be of great interest to test new methods to adapt to the limitations of UASs. Detection of many species is possible, but statistical approaches are unavailable if valid inventories of large mammals are the purpose. Contributions of UASs to anti-poaching surveillance are not yet well documented in the scientific literature, but initial studies indicate that this approach could make important contributions to conservation in the next few years. Finally, we conclude that one of the main factors impeding the use of UASs is legislation. Restrictions in the use of airspace prevent researchers from testing all possibilities, and adaptations to the relevant legislation will be necessary in future.

References Powered by Scopus

'Structure-from-Motion' photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications

3165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Unmanned aircraft systems in remote sensing and scientific research: Classification and considerations of use

765Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide: Evaluation and results

587Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and artificial intelligence revolutionizing wildlife monitoring and conservation

367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans

342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation

326Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Linchant, J., Lisein, J., Semeki, J., Lejeune, P., & Vermeulen, C. (2015, October 1). Are unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) the future of wildlife monitoring? A review of accomplishments and challenges. Mammal Review. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12046

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250306090120

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 305

67%

Researcher 116

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 25

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 206

45%

Environmental Science 162

36%

Engineering 50

11%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 38

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0