Major disparities in COVID-19 test positivity for patients with non-English preferred language even after accounting for race and social factors in the United States in 2020

26Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has further exposed inequities in our society, demonstrated by disproportionate COVID-19 infection rate and mortality in communities of color and low-income communities. One key area of inequity that has yet to be explored is disparities based on preferred language. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 164,368 adults tested for COVID-19 in a large healthcare system across Washington, Oregon, and California from March – July 2020. Using electronic health records, we constructed multi-level models that estimated the odds of testing positive for COVID-19 by preferred language, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and social factors. We further investigated interaction between preferred language and both race/ethnicity and state. Analysis was performed from October–December 2020. Results: Those whose preferred language was not English had higher odds of having a COVID-19 positive test (OR 3.07, p < 0.001); this association remained significant after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and social factors. We found significant interaction between language and race/ethnicity and language and state, but the odds of COVID-19 test positivity remained greater for those whose preferred language was not English compared to those whose preferred language was English within each race/ethnicity and state. Conclusions: People whose preferred language is not English are at greater risk of testing positive for COVID-19 regardless of age, race/ethnicity, geography, or social factors – demonstrating a significant inequity. Research demonstrates that our public health and healthcare systems are centered on English speakers, creating structural and systemic barriers to health. Addressing these barriers are long overdue and urgent for COVID-19 prevention.

References Powered by Scopus

The social determinants of health: It's time to consider the causes of the causes

2360Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited english proficiency? A systematic review of the literature

1108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Language proficiency and adverse events in US hospitals: A pilot study

494Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Differences in access to virtual and in-person primary care by race/ethnicity and community social vulnerability among adults diagnosed with COVID-19 in a large, multi-state health system

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of Preferred Language and Timing of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Disease Outcomes

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Temporal and spatial trends in suicide-related visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, 2018–2021

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen-Cline, H., Li, H. F., Gill, M., Rodriguez, F., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Wolberg, H., … Vartanian, K. (2021). Major disparities in COVID-19 test positivity for patients with non-English preferred language even after accounting for race and social factors in the United States in 2020. BMC Public Health, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12171-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

46%

Researcher 6

46%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

33%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

22%

Engineering 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 29

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free