Towards 2011 output geographies: exploring the need for, and challenges involved in, maintenance of the 2001 output geographies.

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article describes and presents early results from the ESRC-funded Census 2011Geog project, which aims to develop and evaluate automated procedures to maintain (split, merge or re-design) the 2001 Census output geographies in order to create the 2011 output geographies for England and Wales. The article explores population change at the small area level between 2001 and 2005-06, and considers the extent to which the 2001 Census output geographies are likely to be appropriate for the release of 2011 Census data. It concludes that the vast majority of output geography areas are unlikely to have breached population thresholds by 2011, but that a small proportion of areas will require maintenance. The article finishes with a discussion of the key decisions that need to be made before the automated procedures can be implemented operationally.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Maintaining existing zoning systems using automated zone-design techniques: Methods for creating the 2011 census output geographies for England and Wales

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modelling residential segregation as unevenness and clustering: A multilevel modelling approach incorporating spatial dependence and tackling the MAUP

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of a geographical framework for census workplace data

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cockings, S., Harfoot, A., & Hornby, D. (2009). Towards 2011 output geographies: exploring the need for, and challenges involved in, maintenance of the 2001 output geographies. Population Trends, (138), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1057/pt.2009.46

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

83%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 3

50%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

17%

Arts and Humanities 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free