Scope and limitations of minimal invasive surgery in practice of pediatric surgical oncology

6Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Management of Solid tumors in children needs a comprehensive multimodality protocol based treatment plan. Open surgical removal of the tumors occurring in any of the sites such as abdomen, thorax, chest wall, HFN (head, face, neck), brain and extremities, is the option which has been traditionally practiced even in the present era and in most of the centers. Nevertheless with the advances in science and technology and with ever increasing usage and expertise of laparoscopy in children, it's application has extended to treatment of solid tumors in children. A review of the scope of such intervention as well as the limitations of minimal invasive surgery in this specialized field of pediatric surgery has been attempted in this article.

References Powered by Scopus

Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases

160Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Minimally invasive surgery in children with cancer

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Laparoscopic adrenal surgery for neuroblastomas in children

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Minimally invasive surgery in the management of abdominal tumors in children

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Minimally invasive surgery in childhood cancer: A challenging future

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Video-Assisted Needle Core Biopsy in Children Affected by Neuroblastoma: A Novel Combined Technique

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhatnagar, S., & Sarin, Y. K. (2010). Scope and limitations of minimal invasive surgery in practice of pediatric surgical oncology. Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. Georg Thieme Verlag. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.76198

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

27%

Researcher 3

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

79%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Chemistry 1

7%

Engineering 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free