An evaluation of the driving and restraining factors affecting the implementation of hospital accreditation standards: A force field analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Integrating accreditation standards in healthcare business operations is context-sensitive and affected by diverse factors. This study explored the driving and restraining factors influencing the implementation of accreditation standards in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Methods: A qualitative design using semi-structured in-depth interviews was employed. Twenty-seven hospital directors and 29 hospital quality directors were interviewed. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed. A force-field analysis framework was adopted to present a visual picture of the various factors influencing the implementation of hospital accreditation standards. Results: The analysis yielded 42 driving and restraining factors affecting the implementation of accreditation standards. The main drivers identified were teamwork, the quality mindset of leaders and staff, employing a continuous readiness model, and commitment toward customers. By contrast, insufficient manpower, infrastructural gaps, workforce recruitment challenges, variability among surveyors, the COVID-19 pandemic, limited financial support, and bureaucratic decision-making procedures were the main reported restrainers. At the national level, perceived restrainers pose a serious challenge to compliance with the existing accreditation model. Conclusion: Exploring the factors affecting accreditation standards implementation assists in assessing accreditation readiness, helps to prioritize efforts to strengthen drivers and weaken restrainers, and contributes to the institutionalization of accreditation standards.

References Powered by Scopus

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

23640Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?

2171Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods

1792Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The attitudes of hospital directors towards normalising accreditation standards: A qualitative descriptive study for Saudi Arabia

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring Key Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Robots in Home Healthcare Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Method

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling the enablers of AACSB implementation in business schools: ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC analysis

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hussein, M., Pavlova, M., & Groot, W. (2023). An evaluation of the driving and restraining factors affecting the implementation of hospital accreditation standards: A force field analysis. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 16(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2022.2084810

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

33%

Researcher 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

40%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

30%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

20%

Computer Science 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0