School District Crisis Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Plans — United States, 2012

  • Silverman B
  • Chen B
  • Brener N
  • et al.
6Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The unique characteristics of children dictate the need for school-based all-hazards response plans during natural disasters, emerging infectious diseases, and terrorism (1-3). Schools are a critical community institution serving a vulnerable population that must be accounted for in public health preparedness plans; prepared schools are adopting policies and plans for crisis preparedness, response, and recovery (2-4). The importance of having such plans in place is underscored by the development of a new Healthy People 2020 objective (PREP-5) to "increase the percentage of school districts that require schools to include specific topics in their crisis preparedness, response, and recovery plans" (5). Because decisions about such plans are usually made at the school district level, it is important to examine district-level policies and practices. Although previous reports have provided national estimates of the percentage of districts with policies and practices in place (6), these estimates have not been analyzed by U.S. Census region* and urbanicity.(†) Using data from the 2012 School Health Policies and Practices Study (SHPPS), this report examines policies and practices related to school district preparedness, response, and recovery. In general, districts in the Midwest were less likely to require schools to include specific topics in their crisis preparedness plans than districts in the Northeast and South. Urban districts tended to be more likely than nonurban districts to require specific topics in school preparedness plans. Southern districts tended to be more likely than districts in other regions to engage with partners when developing plans. No differences in district collaboration (with the exception of local fire department engagement) were observed by level of urbanicity. School-based preparedness planning needs to be coordinated with interdisciplinary community partners to achieve Healthy People 2020 PREP-5 objectives for this vulnerable population.

References Powered by Scopus

Disaster planning for schools

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Public health emergency planning for children in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) disasters

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CDC grand rounds: Addressing preparedness challenges for children in public health emergencies

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

School district crisis preparedness, response, and recovery plans — United States, 2006, 2012, and 2016

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Health, safety, and education measures for fire in schools: A review article

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disaster Preparedness in K-12 Schools: An Integrative Review

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silverman, B., Chen, B., Brener, N., Kruger, J., Krishna, N., Renard, P., … Avchen, R. N. (2016). School District Crisis Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Plans — United States, 2012. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65(36), 949–953. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6536a2

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

65%

Researcher 4

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 8

44%

Social Sciences 5

28%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

17%

Psychology 2

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 37

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0