Spatial scaling of extinction rates: Theory and data reveal nonlinearity and a major upscaling and downscaling challenge

31Citations
Citations of this article
122Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: Biodiversity loss is a key component of biodiversity change and can impact ecosystem services. However, estimation of the loss has focused mostly on per-species extinction rates measured over a limited number of spatial scales, with little theory linking small-scale extirpations to global extinctions. Here, we provide such a link by introducing the relationship between area and the number of extinctions (number of extinctions–area relationship; NxAR) and between area and the proportion of extinct species (proportion of extinctions–area relationship; PxAR). Unlike static patterns, such as the species–area relationship, NxAR and PxAR represent spatial scaling of a dynamic process. We show theoretical and empirical forms of these relationships and we discuss their role in perception and estimation of the current extinction crisis. Location: U.S.A., Europe, Czech Republic and Barro Colorado Island (Panama). Time period: 1500–2009. Major taxa studied: Vascular plants, birds, butterflies and trees. Methods: We derived the expected forms of NxAR and PxAR from several theoretical frameworks, including the theory of island biogeography, neutral models and species–area relationships. We constructed NxAR and PxAR from five empirical datasets collected over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Results: Although increasing PxAR is theoretically possible, empirical data generally support a decreasing PxAR; the proportion of extinct species decreases with area. In contrast, both theory and data revealed complex relationships between numbers of extinctions and area (NxAR), including nonlinear, unimodal and U-shaped relationships, depending on region, taxon and temporal scale. Main conclusions: The wealth of forms of NxAR and PxAR explains why biodiversity change appears scale dependent. Furthermore, the complex scale dependence of NxAR and PxAR means that global extinctions indicate little about local extirpations, and vice versa. Hence, effort should be made to understand and report extinction rates as a scale-dependent problem. In this effort, estimation of scaling relationships such as NxAR and PxAR should be central.

References Powered by Scopus

A safe operating space for humanity

8598Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge

5997Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity

5133Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Species richness change across spatial scales

163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biodiversity conservation through the lens of metacommunity ecology

113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Taxonomic and functional diversity change is scale dependent

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keil, P., Pereira, H. M., Cabral, J. S., Chase, J. M., May, F., Martins, I. S., & Winter, M. (2018). Spatial scaling of extinction rates: Theory and data reveal nonlinearity and a major upscaling and downscaling challenge. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 27(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12669

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

49%

Researcher 29

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47

52%

Environmental Science 38

42%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

3%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0