Review helpfulness prediction: Survey

6Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Online reviews have become the major driving factor influencing purchasing behavior and patterns of social customers. However, it is difficult for customer to cover good reviews about any product or service according to massive amount of reviews latest years. Many previous researches provide innovative models about predicting review helpfulness in E-commerce websites. Some of these studies exploring the direct effect of review attributes on review helpfulness while others focused on reviewer's attributes only. The main objective of this research is to review the most important attributes that have an affect on review helpfulness from many perspectives such as datasets, techniques, frameworks and evaluation methods of the experiments. The paper ends up with important findings about most attributes effect the review helpfulness such as Review Valence.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models

11812Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Forming Inferences about Some Intraclass Correlation Coefficients

5362Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on amazon.com

2431Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Predicting ewom’s influence on purchase intention based on helpfulness, credibility, information quality and professionalism

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review helpfulness prediction on e-commerce websites: A comprehensive survey

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using bayesian network to predict online review helpfulness

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almutairi, Y., Abdullah, M., & Alahmadi, D. (2019). Review helpfulness prediction: Survey. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 7(1), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i1.420

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 4

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 6

67%

Social Sciences 1

11%

Engineering 1

11%

Arts and Humanities 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0